Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 5, 2023 at 10:09 vote accept P.Labarque
Mar 5, 2023 at 1:06 answer added Brendan McKay timeline score: 1
Mar 4, 2023 at 17:14 comment added P.Labarque @Brendan: Now I understand the confusion. Your question is what I mean. It's corrected. Excuses.
Mar 4, 2023 at 17:10 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Mar 4, 2023 at 17:03 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 62 characters in body
Mar 4, 2023 at 10:50 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Mar 4, 2023 at 10:12 comment added P.Labarque @Brendan: Yes, the bold sentence is the question. And in fact I'm only interrested in it for maximal planar polygons without separating triangles. What follows (included the drawings) is peripheral information, not essential for it. And of coarse a trangulated planar polygon has at least two ears (Gary Meister, 1975 and Max Dehn circa 1899, Wikipedia).
Mar 4, 2023 at 1:06 comment added Brendan McKay Your use of "possible" and "impossible" is confusing, and "one" is also unclear. Does your bold sentence mean "Is it always possible to choose a hamiltonian cycle so that at least one of the polygons has only two ears?" (After noting that less than two ears never happens; this is equivalent to a non-trivial tree having at least two leaves.)
Mar 3, 2023 at 20:11 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
Mar 3, 2023 at 17:56 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 120 characters in body
Mar 3, 2023 at 16:54 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 133 characters in body
Mar 3, 2023 at 14:05 history edited P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0
added 152 characters in body
Feb 26, 2023 at 8:32 history edited P.Labarque
edited tags
S Feb 26, 2023 at 8:22 review First questions
Feb 26, 2023 at 9:43
S Feb 26, 2023 at 8:22 history asked P.Labarque CC BY-SA 4.0