Timeline for How is the Gronwall lemma used in this paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023 at 21:37 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Akira : I am glad this was of help. | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 18:53 | comment | added | Akira | Thank you so much for your dedicated support for which I'm very grateful. | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 18:48 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2023 at 18:44 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Akira : I think you reproduced the text correctly, with obvious minor differences in notation. | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 18:21 | vote | accept | Akira | ||
| Feb 23, 2023 at 18:19 | comment | added | Akira | I have just added the screenshot of the relevant part. Could you have a check if I understand the formula correctly? | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 17:59 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Akira : I have addressed this now. | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 17:58 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2023 at 17:43 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1034 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2023 at 16:40 | comment | added | Akira | Thank you so much for your answer! The version in Wikipedia page requires $\beta$ to be non-negative. It seems your $\beta$ is non-positive. Could you elaborate more? | |
| Feb 23, 2023 at 15:50 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |