Timeline for Why is the crossing number of Tutte 12-cage 170?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2023 at 12:27 | comment | added | domotorp | I've updated Wikipedia. | |
| Feb 22, 2023 at 4:35 | comment | added | Licheng Zhang | Crossing Number Web Compute seems to only support graphs with up to 100 vertices. | |
| Feb 21, 2023 at 15:59 | comment | added | Licheng Zhang | Thanks. 170 may be wrong as I see that an embedding with rectilinear crossing number 166 was found by G. Exoo (pers. comm., May 12, 2019) which QuickCross was able to reduce to a graph crossing number of 165 (E. Weisstein, May 12, 2019). in this link mathworld.wolfram.com/Tutte12-Cage.html | |
| Feb 21, 2023 at 15:53 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | I'd guess that this is just another case where Wikipedia misinterprets its sources. You could try verifying the number yourself using the Crossing Number Web Compute, though the Tutte 12-cage may be a bit too big. | |
| Feb 21, 2023 at 14:09 | history | asked | Licheng Zhang | CC BY-SA 4.0 |