Timeline for Decomposing a set of integers as a union of well-separated (discrete) intervals
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2023 at 22:00 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Feb 18, 2023 at 18:09 | comment | added | Salvo Tringali | To me, (what I'm calling) the boxing dimension looks like a natural notion for all sets of integers. In particular, Weihao and I are using it as a measure of the "complexity" of a finite subset of $\mathbb N$. Let's see if someone else comes up with other pointers, it's quite hard to believe that the notion hasn't shown up before in the literature. | |
| Feb 18, 2023 at 11:07 | history | edited | Pedro A. Garcia-Sanchez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 18, 2023 at 11:04 | comment | added | Pedro A. Garcia-Sanchez | Good! Probably, someone has used this concept to measure how many runs of integers has a numerical semigroup, which should be less than or equal to the number of what people call sporadic elements (or small elements, or left elements - say elements below the conductor). | |
| Feb 18, 2023 at 11:01 | comment | added | Salvo Tringali | Hi Pedro. :-) I edited the OP to clarify that yes, also infinite intervals are allowed in the definition of the boxing dimension. | |
| Feb 18, 2023 at 10:59 | history | edited | Pedro A. Garcia-Sanchez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| S Feb 18, 2023 at 10:56 | review | First answers | |||
| Feb 18, 2023 at 11:23 | |||||
| S Feb 18, 2023 at 10:56 | history | answered | Pedro A. Garcia-Sanchez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |