Skip to main content
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by AndreaPaco
Bounty Ended with cs89's answer chosen by AndreaPaco
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by AndreaPaco
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by AndreaPaco
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
Denis Serre
  • 52.3k
  • 10
  • 146
  • 300

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)?

For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e. E.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$$$H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$).$$H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N \frac{q_iq_j}{|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|}\,.$$ Another possible and reasonable assumption would be that the initial velocities of the 2nd-order problem deviate only little from the fixed initial velocities of the 1st order problem.

I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)?

For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$). Another possible and reasonable assumption would be that the initial velocities of the 2nd-order problem deviate only little from the fixed initial velocities of the 1st order problem.

I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)?

For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed. E.g. that the energy $$H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $$H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N \frac{q_iq_j}{|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|}\,.$$ Another possible and reasonable assumption would be that the initial velocities of the 2nd-order problem deviate only little from the fixed initial velocities of the 1st order problem.

I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

Introduced a possible assumption that one may want to make, as suggested by a comment.
Source Link
AndreaPaco
  • 255
  • 1
  • 11

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} \end{equation} \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)? 

For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$). Another possible and reasonable assumption would be that the initial velocities of the 2nd-order problem deviate only little from the fixed initial velocities of the 1st order problem.

I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} \end{equation} \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)? For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$). I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)? 

For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$). Another possible and reasonable assumption would be that the initial velocities of the 2nd-order problem deviate only little from the fixed initial velocities of the 1st order problem.

I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?

Source Link
AndreaPaco
  • 255
  • 1
  • 11

Solution of an ODE upon singular perturbation

The following question originates from a Physics problem, so I apologize if I am not using a suitable mathematical jargon.

The original system involves $N$ massless electric charges at position $\boldsymbol{r}_1$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N$ which can move on a plane pierced by a uniform and constant transverse magnetic field $\boldsymbol{B}$. The motion equation governing the dynamics of the $j$-th charge is: \begin{equation} \label{eq:Motion_eq} \boldsymbol{0}=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} where $q_j$ is the charge of the $j$-th electric charge and $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ is the electric field generated at position $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ by all the remaining charges. Moreover, at any time, the electric field at position $\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j)$ can be written as $$ \boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) = \sum_{i=1\\i\neq j}^N q_i\frac{\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i}{|\boldsymbol{r}_j-\boldsymbol{r}_i|^3}. $$ The motion equation above is manifestly of first order in time and the only initial conditions one needs are the initial positions of the massless charges, i.e. $\boldsymbol{r}_1(t=0)$, $\boldsymbol{r}_2(t=0)$, ..., $\boldsymbol{r}_N(t=0)$.

Now let us switch from massless to massive charges. This means that the aforementioned motion equation transforms as: \begin{equation} \end{equation} \begin{equation} M_j \ddot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j=q_j\,\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j\times\boldsymbol{B}\, +\, q_j\boldsymbol{E}(\boldsymbol{r}_j) \end{equation} We assume that all the masses $M_j$ are very small. As far as I understand, the introduction of a non-zero mass constitutes a singular perturbation as it manifestly alters the order of the differential equations. Accordingly, the number of initial conditions which one should set doubles.

My question is: if one knows the solution $\{\boldsymbol{r}_1(t),\,\boldsymbol{r}_2(t),\,\dots,\,\boldsymbol{r}_N(t)\}$ of the massless problem (i.e. of the system of first-order differential equations), what can be said about the solution of the massive problem (i.e. of the system of second-order differential equations)? For simplicity we can assume $M_j=M\,\forall j$ and we can also make additional assumptions, if needed (e.g. that the energy $H_\mathrm{massive}=T+V=\sum_{j=1}^N\frac{1}{2}M_j\dot{\boldsymbol{r}}_j^2 + V$ of the massive system is limited and does not significantly depart from that of the massless system $H_\mathrm{massless}=V=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^N\sum_{i\neq j}^N q_iq_j/|\boldsymbol{r}_i-\boldsymbol{r}_j|$). I guess that a term $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ will show up in the solutions of the perturbed system. Is this correct? Apart from this term, is it possible to write a sort of Taylor expansion involving powers of $M$? Is there a general framework to approach this singular-perturbation problem?