Skip to main content
Fixed minor typo, grammar.
Source Link
David White
  • 30.3k
  • 9
  • 154
  • 250

What should be required from a model category so that the category of algebraic objects in it has the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induceinduces a monadic adjunction inon it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from thea model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it has the right transferred-transferred model structure?

What should be required from a model category that the category of algebraic objects in it has the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it has the right transferred model structure?

What should be required from a model category so that the category of algebraic objects in it has the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory induces a monadic adjunction on it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from a model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it has the right-transferred model structure?

deleted 11 characters in body
Source Link

What should be required from a model category that the category of algebraic objects onin it carry ahas the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it is provided with ahas the right transferred model structure?

What should be required from a model category that algebraic objects on it carry a natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it is provided with a right transferred model structure?

What should be required from a model category that the category of algebraic objects in it has the natural model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it has the right transferred model structure?

added 1 character in body
Source Link

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books or on, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it is provided with a right transferred model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books or on nlab.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it is provided with a right transferred model structure?

I have two reference questions

  1. What should be required of a category with finite products so that a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory to induce monadic adjunction in it? This should be perfectly standard (I think I saw it a month ago), but now I can't find it in books, nlab or MO.

  2. What should be required from the model category so that the category of algebras of a (multi-sorted, finitary) Lawvere theory in it is provided with a right transferred model structure?

Source Link
Loading