Timeline for A (bi)alternant formula for Wronskian
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14 at 19:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 15, 2023 at 19:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 18, 2023 at 18:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 20, 2023 at 17:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 18, 2023 at 17:00 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Name of post
|
| Feb 18, 2023 at 14:26 | answer | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 6, 2023 at 9:47 | comment | added | Martin R | One case is easy: $W_{n-1}(f_1,\ldots, f_{n})$ is the derivative of the Wronskian $W(f_1,\ldots, f_{n})$. | |
| Feb 6, 2023 at 9:09 | history | asked | Athena | CC BY-SA 4.0 |