Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
formatting, added tag
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Assume $f(t,\omega)$ is (i)separable, (ii) measurable as function from $((0,T)×\Omega)$ into $R$ and (iii) is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$ Also $\int_0^Tf^2(s)ds<\infty$ almost sure.
Is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$?
Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$$$\{X(t, w) \in F \text{ for all } t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F \text{ for all } t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R
In the book they wrote:
Since the integrand is a separable process that is $F_t$ measurable, the integral is also $F_t$ measurable.
It was a part of the theorem.

Assume $f(t,\omega)$ is (i)separable, (ii) measurable as function from $((0,T)×\Omega)$ into $R$ and (iii) is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$ Also $\int_0^Tf^2(s)ds<\infty$ almost sure.
Is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$?
Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R
In the book they wrote:
Since the integrand is a separable process that is $F_t$ measurable, the integral is also $F_t$ measurable.
It was a part of the theorem.

Assume $f(t,\omega)$ is (i)separable, (ii) measurable as function from $((0,T)×\Omega)$ into $R$ and (iii) is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$ Also $\int_0^Tf^2(s)ds<\infty$ almost sure.
Is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$?
Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F \text{ for all } t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F \text{ for all } t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R
In the book they wrote:
Since the integrand is a separable process that is $F_t$ measurable, the integral is also $F_t$ measurable.
It was a part of the theorem.

Bumped by Community user
added 220 characters in body
Source Link

SupposeAssume $f(t,\omega)$ is separable stochastic process which(i)separable, (ii) measurable as function from $((0,T)×\Omega)$ into $R$ and (iii) is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$, is Also $\int_0^Tf^2(s)ds<\infty$ almost sure.
Is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$? We assume that integral exists almost sure. 
Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R
In the book they wrote:
Since the integrand is a separable process that is $F_t$ measurable, the integral is also $F_t$ measurable.
It was a part of the theorem.

Suppose $f(t,\omega)$ is separable stochastic process which is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$, is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$? We assume that integral exists almost sure. Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R

Assume $f(t,\omega)$ is (i)separable, (ii) measurable as function from $((0,T)×\Omega)$ into $R$ and (iii) is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$ Also $\int_0^Tf^2(s)ds<\infty$ almost sure.
Is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$?  
Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R
In the book they wrote:
Since the integrand is a separable process that is $F_t$ measurable, the integral is also $F_t$ measurable.
It was a part of the theorem.

added 371 characters in body
Source Link

Suppose $f(t,\omega)$ is separable stochastic process which is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$, is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$? We assume that integral exists almost sure. Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R

Suppose $f(t,\omega)$ is separable stochastic process which is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$, is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$? We assume that integral exists almost sure.

Suppose $f(t,\omega)$ is separable stochastic process which is adapted to the filtration $F_t, 0<t<T$, is integral $\int_0^tf(s,\omega)ds$ measurable with respect to $F_t$? We assume that integral exists almost sure. Definition: A stochastic process $(X(t), t\in I)$ is called separable if there exists a countable sequence $(t_j)$ that is a dense subset of $I$ and a subset N of $\Omega$ with $P(N)=0$ such that, if $\omega \notin N$, then

$$\{X(t, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t\in J\} = \{X(t_j, w) \in F\ for\ all\ t_j\in J\}$$ for any open subset J of I and for any closed subset F of R

Source Link
Loading