Timeline for Is an extension of two abelian residually finite groups a residually finite group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2023 at 8:10 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Jan 27, 2023 at 18:55 | answer | added | YCor | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 27, 2023 at 18:18 | answer | added | AGenevois | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 27, 2023 at 16:25 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
a minor typo
|
| Jan 27, 2023 at 16:15 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added missing word in title
|
| Jan 27, 2023 at 16:13 | comment | added | Claudio Bravo | Thanks YCor. I have done :) | |
| Jan 27, 2023 at 16:11 | history | edited | Claudio Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2023 at 14:04 | comment | added | YCor | This is not covered by the linked answer. So I'd suggest you edit your question by adding the assumption that $H,K$ are abelian. | |
| Jan 27, 2023 at 13:34 | comment | added | Claudio Bravo | Thank YCor. Do you know what happening when $H$ and $K$ are both abelian? Do we have the same answer? | |
| Jan 26, 2023 at 17:23 | comment | added | YCor | No, it's false, there are many counterexamples. It's a duplicate, see this answer: mathoverflow.net/a/78363/14094 | |
| S Jan 26, 2023 at 16:44 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 26, 2023 at 17:29 | |||||
| S Jan 26, 2023 at 16:44 | history | asked | Claudio Bravo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |