Timeline for Discrete uniqueness sets for the two-sided Laplace transform?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2023 at 19:14 | vote | accept | r_l | ||
| Jan 24, 2023 at 14:35 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 24, 2023 at 11:50 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | In the same vein, it is not enough to assume that $T f(n) = 0$ for all integer $n$: the strong Stieltjes moment problem can be indeterminate, too. | |
| Jan 24, 2023 at 11:42 | comment | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | A rather obvious comment: $T f(n) = 0$ for all natural $n$ is not enough. Indeed: if we write $Tf(s) = \int_0^\infty f(-\log t) t^{s - 1} dt$, then $T f(n) = 0$ corresponds to the Stieltjes moment problem. | |
| Jan 24, 2023 at 10:55 | history | asked | r_l | CC BY-SA 4.0 |