Timeline for Growth of Coefficients of cusp forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2011 at 17:03 | comment | added | paul garrett | I myself have some confusion about the correctness... When the first version(s) appeared several months ago, I looked at them in some detail, and was unable to see how the same argument wouldn't apply to situations where the same conclusion is not valid... Perhaps something was implicit that I didn't see. | |
| Oct 28, 2010 at 16:15 | comment | added | Kimball | Does anyone have any ideas about the correctness of this paper? I haven't looked at it but it seems to have been revised every month, which seems strange. | |
| Oct 28, 2010 at 15:20 | comment | added | Stopple | You probably mean holomorphic forms, but it's worth commenting that this paper on the arXiv arxiv.org/abs/0802.3548 seems to claim to prove the Ramanujan conjecture for Maass forms. | |
| Oct 28, 2010 at 11:21 | answer | added | François Brunault | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 28, 2010 at 7:47 | answer | added | David Loeffler | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 28, 2010 at 0:11 | history | asked | Jill | CC BY-SA 2.5 |