Timeline for P-adic L functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2023 at 21:21 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | @JustLikeNumberTheory I know too little about $\ell=p$ case. The $p$-adic $L$-functions should still be the complex $L$-function. But on the algebraic side étale or Galois cohomology will not be the right thing. Articles by Richard Crew could be a good starting point. | |
| Sep 13, 2023 at 19:40 | comment | added | JustLikeNumberTheory | @ChrisWuthrich Is there a description of what form the p-adic L-function takes in the geometric case p=char(k)? | |
| May 8, 2018 at 11:23 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | @debanjana you can start with his introduction (number 28 in this list sites.math.washington.edu/~greenber/Publications.html ) and then go to number 26. | |
| May 7, 2018 at 23:11 | comment | added | debanjana | Can someone please clarify which article of Greenberg talks about the p-adic L function associated to a Selmer group? | |
| Apr 21, 2011 at 17:23 | vote | accept | Arijit | ||
| Oct 27, 2010 at 23:46 | comment | added | Arijit | Thanks Chris. Your answer was certainly very helpful. So I am happy to think of a p-adic L function as a measure(or rather a pseudo-measure). But in Tate's thesis the zeta functions arose as eigenvectors of some 1-dimensional complex representations. So do we expect the same thing here as well like p-adic L-function arising as an eigenvector of some p-adic representation. Also when you think about p-adic measures there is no Haar measure. | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 22:13 | history | edited | Chris Wuthrich | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 283 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2010 at 21:52 | history | answered | Chris Wuthrich | CC BY-SA 2.5 |