Skip to main content
added 89 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Petrunin
  • 45k
  • 14
  • 135
  • 299

We can assume that immersed surface divides the space into finite number of regions. Then your formula gives volume of of these regions counted with muliplicity.

enter image description here

Subdivide your surface into singular surfaces such that each cuts only one region. Summing up the isoperimetric inequalities for some of these surfaces implies the inequality that you are looking for.

We can assume that immersed surface divides the space into finite number of regions. Then your formula gives volume of of these regions counted with muliplicity.

Subdivide your surface into singular surfaces such that each cuts only one region. Summing up the isoperimetric inequalities for these surfaces implies the inequality that you are looking for.

We can assume that immersed surface divides the space into finite number of regions. Then your formula gives volume of of these regions counted with muliplicity.

enter image description here

Subdivide your surface into singular surfaces such that each cuts only one region. Summing up the isoperimetric inequalities for some of these surfaces implies the inequality that you are looking for.

Source Link
Anton Petrunin
  • 45k
  • 14
  • 135
  • 299

We can assume that immersed surface divides the space into finite number of regions. Then your formula gives volume of of these regions counted with muliplicity.

Subdivide your surface into singular surfaces such that each cuts only one region. Summing up the isoperimetric inequalities for these surfaces implies the inequality that you are looking for.