Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$$$1<p,q<\infty\quad\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of (2) for (1) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (2) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (3) is false outside the range of exponents described by (2). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of (2) for (1) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (2) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (3) is false outside the range of exponents described by (2). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$1<p,q<\infty\quad\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{q}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of (2) for (1) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (2) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (3) is false outside the range of exponents described by (2). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define $$ Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy. $$ The

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of    $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\label{1}\tag{1} $$$$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\label{2}\tag{2}$$$$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of \eqref{(2}) for \eqref{(1}) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is \eqref{(2}) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\label{3}\tag{3}\;?$$$$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that \eqref{(3} is) is false outside the range of exponents described by \eqref{(2}). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define $$ Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy. $$ The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of  $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\label{1}\tag{1} $$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\label{2}\tag{2}$$ The necessity of \eqref{2} for \eqref{1} can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is \eqref{2} necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\label{3}\tag{3}\;?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that \eqref{3} is false outside the range of exponents described by \eqref{2}. Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of  $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of (2) for (1) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (2) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (3) is false outside the range of exponents described by (2). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Minor Math Jaxing (formula hyperlinking)
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The $$ Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy. $$ The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of    $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$$$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\label{1}\tag{1} $$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$$$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\label{2}\tag{2}$$ The necessity of (\eqref{2)} for (\eqref{1)} can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (\eqref{2)} necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$$$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\label{3}\tag{3}\;?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (\eqref{3) is} is false outside the range of exponents described by (\eqref{2)}. Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define

$$Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy.$$

The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of  $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\qquad (1)$$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\qquad (2)$$ The necessity of (2) for (1) can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is (2) necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\qquad (3)\qquad ?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that (3) is false outside the range of exponents described by (2). Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

Let $0<\alpha<1$ and define $$ Tf(x):=\int e^{\dot{\imath} x y} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy. $$ The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality characterizes $L^p-L^q$ boundedness of  $Hf(x):=\int \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}dy$ which majorizes $|Tf(x)|$ by the triangle inequality, when $f>0$. It asserts that $$ \|Hf\|_{q}\leq C \|f\|_{p}\label{1}\tag{1} $$ where $C$ is a constant independent of $f$, if and only if $$\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{p}=1-\alpha\label{2}\tag{2}$$ The necessity of \eqref{2} for \eqref{1} can be easily deduced by scaling.

My question:

Is \eqref{2} necessary for the inequality $$ \|Tf\|_{q}\leq C_{1} \|f\|_{p}\label{3}\tag{3}\;?$$

It seems that $T$ does not have any scaling properties. I cannot come up with counterexamples that show that \eqref{3} is false outside the range of exponents described by \eqref{2}. Is the boundedness of $T$ known ?

edited body
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13
Loading
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13
Loading