Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 16, 2023 at 1:16 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jan 14, 2023 at 22:49 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Jan 13, 2023 at 21:52 comment added Fred Hucht The $u$ in the third integral after Prop. 2 is still missing, should be $e^{e^{-u}u}$. Furthermore, this integral can be simplified by a partial integration to simply give $$ e^{1/e-1} - e^{1-e} + \int_{1/e}^e\mathrm dx \, x^{-x}. $$
Jan 13, 2023 at 19:20 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
Updated the answer based on Fred Hucht's comment
Jan 13, 2023 at 19:08 comment added Eric Naslund @FredHucht: That's great, thank you!
Jan 13, 2023 at 18:47 comment added Fred Hucht First note some typos: You mixed up $L(x)$ and $1/L(x)$ a bit in your answer, and a $u$ is missing in the third integral after Prop. 2. Now my point: By integrating the inverse function of $1/L$ we find \begin{align}\int_{0}^{e^{-e}}\frac 1 {L(x)} \,\mathrm dx = e^{1-e}-\int_{1}^{e} e^{u\, W_{-1}[-\log(u)/u]} \, \mathrm du,\end{align} with $W_{k}(z) = \mathrm{ProductLog}[k,z]$. The limiting value from Prop. 1 now is $$1.91873106231887960413475821627\ldots\,.$$
Jan 13, 2023 at 17:28 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
added 123 characters in body
Jan 13, 2023 at 5:50 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
added 111 characters in body
Jan 13, 2023 at 4:35 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
Jan 13, 2023 at 4:29 history edited Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0
added 67 characters in body
Jan 13, 2023 at 4:23 history answered Eric Naslund CC BY-SA 4.0