Timeline for Confusion in notation of representation of Bastiani derivative
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 20:26 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | Distinguished volume form. $\uparrow$ | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 20:16 | comment | added | amilton moreira | @IgorKhavkine in $D F_{\varphi}[h]=\int_M \nabla F_{\varphi}(x) h(x) d x$ , $D F_{\varphi}[h]$ is a number , $h(x)$ is a section of a vector bundle and $\nabla F_{\varphi}(x)$ is a function . We need that $\nabla F_{\varphi}(x)$ be a section of the dual bundle in order that the expression make sense | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 19:52 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | I may still be misunderstanding your question, but any inclusion $\mathcal{D}(M) \hookrightarrow \mathcal{E}'(M)$ requires a distinguished volume form. If that's not made clear in the article, they must have left it implicit or forgot about it. | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:58 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor grammar & formatting
|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:49 | history | edited | amilton moreira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:37 | comment | added | amilton moreira | @ Igor Khavkine I edited my question. | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:35 | history | edited | amilton moreira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:28 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | The erratic punctuation in your last paragraph makes it really difficult to understand what your question is. :( | |
| Jan 12, 2023 at 18:03 | history | edited | amilton moreira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2023 at 17:46 | history | asked | amilton moreira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |