Timeline for Reference for auto-duality of nearly ordinary deformations associated to Hida families
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2023 at 18:58 | vote | accept | xir | ||
| Jan 9, 2023 at 8:32 | comment | added | David Loeffler | @xir If you put together parts (iii), (iv), and (v) of the theorem from KLZ, then the Galois action drops out; but it isn't literally $R(1)$ that it lands in, it is $R(1 + \mathbf{k})$, where $\mathbf{k}$ is the canonical character $\mathbf{Z}_p^\times \to R^\times$ which specialises to $x \mapsto x^k$ at a weight $k$ point. | |
| Jan 7, 2023 at 17:14 | comment | added | xir | found it in a different ohta paper! | |
| Jan 7, 2023 at 17:13 | answer | added | xir | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 7, 2023 at 11:26 | comment | added | Aphelli | Oops, you’re right (I thought they talked about the Galois action, though…). Maybe in the Ohta paper that they cite, then? | |
| Jan 7, 2023 at 1:07 | comment | added | xir | theorem 7.2.3(v) is very close to what I want, but it doesn't say anything about the Galois action! | |
| Jan 6, 2023 at 22:27 | comment | added | Aphelli | My entry point would be Section 7 of Kings, Loeffler, Zerbes, “Rankin-Eisenstein classes and explicit reciprocity laws” (arxiv.org/abs/1503.02888) and references therein, but that may not be optimal. I merely happened to study that paper not too long ago. | |
| Jan 6, 2023 at 22:10 | history | asked | xir | CC BY-SA 4.0 |