Timeline for "Riemann–Stieltjes derivative"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2014 at 18:48 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed tag 'tag-removed'
|
| Jul 16, 2014 at 18:10 | answer | added | Radym | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 18:00 | answer | added | Hany | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 16:58 | comment | added | Roy Maclean | Follow up question: mathoverflow.net/questions/43807/… | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 14:42 | history | edited | Roy Maclean | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 431 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2010 at 12:44 | answer | added | Florian | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 12:43 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | If you want the fundamental theorem to have any chance of being true, the obvious definition is lim_{h to 0} ((f(x+h) - f(x))/(g(x+h) - g(x)). | |
| Oct 27, 2010 at 12:27 | history | asked | Roy Maclean | CC BY-SA 2.5 |