Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 4, 2023 at 13:20 vote accept Daniel Miller
Jan 4, 2023 at 21:33 comment added Z. M Is it necessary to introduce a Tate twist in the formulation of local Tate duality? The $M^*$ seems to be the Pontryagin dual, i.e. against $\mathbb Q/\mathbb Z$, thus it might not be surprising that this also appears on the RHS?
S Jan 4, 2023 at 21:22 review First answers
Jan 4, 2023 at 21:35
S Jan 4, 2023 at 21:22 history answered ollijvn CC BY-SA 4.0