Timeline for Does this special vector field affect on sectional curvature?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2023 at 17:45 | comment | added | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | @Gabe K: Thank you, you right. | |
| Jan 5, 2023 at 14:31 | comment | added | Gabe K | In general, you shouldn’t change a question after it has been answered. Instead, it’s better to make an edit to the end of the question specifying the setting you are considering. | |
| Jan 5, 2023 at 13:17 | history | edited | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 19:12 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 9, 2023 at 3:06 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2023 at 18:53 | comment | added | L.F. Cavenaghi | I am flagging this question because the author does not assume any topological constraint on the manifold, despite arguing the already received answers are not satisfactory, though mentioning 1d manifolds, where the concept of sectional curvature does not exist. Also, he asks to $alpha$ be non-zero, what is not possible on the closed setting. I recommend the OP make further clarifications. | |
| Jan 4, 2023 at 18:36 | history | edited | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 120 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 16:51 | history | edited | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 129 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 16:03 | answer | added | MyShepherd | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 4, 2023 at 15:44 | history | edited | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 15:26 | answer | added | Gabe K | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 4, 2023 at 14:08 | history | edited | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 9:52 | history | asked | Hamidreza Fasihi_Ramandi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |