Timeline for Meaning of the coadjoint representation and its orbits
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2023 at 21:42 | history | edited | NinjaDarth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Upgraded the layout (\hspace 1em becomes \quad), removed the editorial remarks. You can find them in the earlier edits.
|
| Oct 25, 2023 at 21:39 | comment | added | NinjaDarth | Ok. I'll remove the editorial, if you wish. | |
| Dec 30, 2022 at 21:53 | comment | added | LSpice | I love the historical background of this answer, but perhaps your opening could be phrased more objectively as, for example, "this perspective is historically backwards"? I don't think one can objectively argue about whether one perspective is more or less intuitive. For example, for me, writing things out explicitly in the way that you do makes things much harder, not easier, to hang a geometric intuition on—but I understand that there are plenty of people who reason otherwise, and I definitely feel it's important to have both viewpoints available. | |
| Dec 30, 2022 at 21:52 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
A few typos, and TeX
|
| Dec 30, 2022 at 21:30 | history | edited | NinjaDarth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Additional remarks on the Cartan-Maurer forms and co-tangent bundle.
|
| Dec 30, 2022 at 21:20 | history | edited | NinjaDarth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Ditto.
|
| Dec 30, 2022 at 21:15 | history | answered | NinjaDarth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |