Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 23, 2023 at 6:53 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
added 34 characters in body
Feb 6, 2023 at 13:46 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 67 characters in body
Jan 28, 2023 at 0:14 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
added 176 characters in body
Jan 14, 2023 at 8:13 comment added Gottfried Helms @SylvainJULIEN : like "Oil-eir" (second syllable might have a better representation; likely in WP there is a better one)
Jan 14, 2023 at 6:12 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
added 64 characters in body
Dec 31, 2022 at 16:07 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
added 58 characters in body
Dec 30, 2022 at 9:06 comment added Zaza @KConrad Regularisation as in 'Zeta Function Regularisation'.
Dec 30, 2022 at 5:40 comment added Zaza @SylvainJULIEN thank you for the comment. Tried to regularize by classical methods in literature but couldn't do it . ( Can't derive a unique numerical value)
Dec 29, 2022 at 19:56 comment added Sylvain JULIEN Like the infinite sum of all the negative integers is regularized by $\zeta(-1)=-1/12$. Something along these lines may be possible seeing the expression in your first logarithm as a factor of a Euler product (not sure of how his name is pronounced in English, is the first sound in it vocalic or consonantic?).
Dec 29, 2022 at 18:35 comment added Zaza @KConrad same meaning, sir! To assign a finite value to an infinite/divergent sum
Dec 29, 2022 at 18:13 comment added KConrad What do you mean by the term “regularization”? I thought it meant “find a divergent expression so that the difference with that converges”. Maybe you mean something else.
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:54 comment added Zaza @KConrad again thank you for the comment. I'm not that used to MathOverflow site so i don't know how it works. I thought the divergence is elementary for number theorist so i didn't gave clarification.
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:54 comment added Zaza @KConrad again thank you for the comment. I'm not that used to MathOverflow site so i don't know how it works. I thought the divergence is elementary for number theorist so i didn't gave clarification! But Regularisation seems much more tough
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:30 comment added KConrad I did not downvote. The only thing “wrong” in the question is that it lacks context: why are you interested in that strange-looking sum? If you want people to see previous posts for that context, include links to them in your question.
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:27 comment added Zaza If something's wrong with the question, please mention. I couldn't understand downvotes.
Dec 29, 2022 at 17:26 comment added Zaza @KConrad thank you for the comment. But tried doing the Regularisation by converting the sum exactly to sum of series of log Zeta derivatives.( You can see my previous posts ) . But I'm unable to get a value so asked again.
Dec 29, 2022 at 16:25 comment added KConrad You didn't say how you know the sum diverges. As $x\to 0$, $-\log(1-x) \sim x$, so for large $p$, $-\log(1-1/\sqrt{ep})\sim 1/\sqrt{ep}$. Thus the $p$-th term in the sum, for large $p$, grows like $(1/\sqrt{ep})\log(p) = \log(p)/\sqrt{ep}$. So your sum over $p \leq x$ is asymptotic (as $x \to \infty$) to $\sum_{p \leq x}\log(p)/\sqrt{ep}$ if the 2nd series tends to $\infty$ with $x$, and it does: it can be shown that $\sum_{p \leq x} \log(p)/\sqrt{p} \sim 2\sqrt{x}$, so $\sum_{p \leq x} \log(p)/\sqrt{ep} \sim 2\sqrt{x}/\sqrt{e}$. Thus to regularize, at least subtract off $2\sqrt{x}/\sqrt{e}$.
Dec 29, 2022 at 15:13 history edited Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0
added 107 characters in body
Dec 29, 2022 at 7:00 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
removed capitals and colon from title
Dec 29, 2022 at 6:51 history asked Zaza CC BY-SA 4.0