Timeline for Generalizing a formula with distributions — Distributional Radon transform
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2022 at 20:00 | answer | added | Daniele Tampieri | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 24, 2022 at 22:56 | comment | added | metaUser | I wanted more space than in the regular line, how would you produce it? | |
| Dec 24, 2022 at 2:28 | comment | added | LSpice |
In general there are plenty of ways to produce something that looks approximately like the desired outcome, but in the best circumstance, as here, there will be one semantically correct way. You can use $$$$ in place of a blank line if you want to, but, aside from making the page slightly slower to load, why would you want to? Anyway, I meant only to suggest, and to apprise if you didn't already know; if, having heard the suggestion, you decide to do things otherwise, then that is your right (but your posts might continue to be edited).
|
|
| Dec 24, 2022 at 1:07 | history | edited | metaUser | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected a $-$ sign typo
|
| Dec 24, 2022 at 1:02 | comment | added | metaUser | Sure the new subtitles look better, but why is it important really? and the $4$ dollar signs worked just fine no? | |
| Dec 23, 2022 at 20:13 | comment | added | LSpice |
MathJax note: please use double stars **double stars**, not $\textbf{TeX fakery}$ $\textbf{TeX fakery}$, for bold; and actual blank lines, not $$$$, for blank lines in the rendered post. I have edited accordingly.
|
|
| Dec 23, 2022 at 20:12 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
TeX -> Mathjax
|
| S Dec 23, 2022 at 19:58 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 24, 2022 at 9:41 | |||||
| S Dec 23, 2022 at 19:58 | history | asked | metaUser | CC BY-SA 4.0 |