Timeline for On diffeomorphisms that preserve the metric
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 14:31 | vote | accept | Ali | ||
| Dec 22, 2022 at 11:29 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 22, 2022 at 3:35 | history | edited | Ali | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified notion of fixing the boundary
|
| Dec 22, 2022 at 3:21 | answer | added | Alexandre Eremenko | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 0:35 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | You do not even need a smooth boundary or a bounded domain. It suffices to assume that the boundary is not contained in a straight line (assuming that "a domain" means an open connected subset). | |
| Dec 22, 2022 at 0:09 | answer | added | Saúl RM | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 21, 2022 at 23:08 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | @DmitryK I assume the OP means the restriction to $\Omega$ of the standard metric of $\mathbb R^2$. | |
| Dec 21, 2022 at 23:02 | comment | added | Dmitrii Korshunov | What do you mean by Euclidean metric? If any flat metric, then any diffeomorpism pulls back flat metric to flat metric. | |
| Dec 21, 2022 at 22:53 | history | asked | Ali | CC BY-SA 4.0 |