Timeline for Motivating the de Rham theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 6, 2017 at 6:05 | answer | added | ಠ_ಠ | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 20:51 | answer | added | Ryan Budney | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 2, 2011 at 13:02 | comment | added | Ketil Tveiten | I've thought of it as the natural extension of the 'miracle' from algebraic topology that the various homology theories (singular, simplicial, CW) are all equal where it makes sense to compare them. Though, to be honest, the de Rham theorem is a much bigger miracle than the other ones. | |
Mar 1, 2011 at 22:06 | answer | added | Steven Gubkin | timeline score: 13 | |
Oct 27, 2010 at 18:34 | vote | accept | Timothy Chow | ||
Oct 27, 2010 at 15:56 | answer | added | Donu Arapura | timeline score: 25 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 21:55 | answer | added | Johannes Ebert | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 20:02 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 13 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 18:03 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 9 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 17:59 | answer | added | Dmitri Pavlov | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 17:56 | answer | added | Deane Yang | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 17:26 | answer | added | Orbicular | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 17:23 | answer | added | Johannes Ebert | timeline score: 26 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 16:42 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | I don't think this deserves to be an answer, so I 'll leave it as a comment. I tend to think of the other way, that de Rham cohomology is the thing that one is often interested in. From this point of view de Rham's theorem gives a tool for understanding it at a deeper level, and also for computing it by bring in topological methods. | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 16:39 | answer | added | Francesco Polizzi | timeline score: 14 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 16:27 | answer | added | Dick Palais | timeline score: 44 | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 16:09 | history | asked | Timothy Chow | CC BY-SA 2.5 |