Timeline for Is there a measure theory for proper classes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2022 at 13:21 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 306 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2022 at 4:53 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Thanks, Joel. I now realise what my blind spot was, but it's good to see what is partially possible. | |
| Dec 12, 2022 at 14:50 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Dec 12, 2022 at 13:54 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Dec 12, 2022 at 13:10 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | That is a fine way of handling measures when the collection of measurable classes is very small---indexed by V. I've edited the answer to mention it. | |
| Dec 12, 2022 at 13:09 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1147 characters in body
|
| Dec 12, 2022 at 6:52 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | I know you know better than me, but I have to ask the naive question: what's wrong with specifying the measure as a class function coded as a subclass of the product of $V$ with whatever the measure is valued in? No need to have access to third-order machinery, I would have thought, but there is undoubtedly a subtlety hiding somewhere.... | |
| Dec 12, 2022 at 4:48 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Link; `\cap` -> `\bigcap`
|
| Dec 12, 2022 at 2:45 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 4.0 |