Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

In a commutative ring $R$, when does the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies$1\le i\le n$ imply $\prod r_i\mid r$$\prod_{1\le i\le n} r_i\mid r$ (when $r_i$ are fixed)?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

In a commutative ring $R$, when does the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies $\prod r_i\mid r$ (when $r_i$ are fixed)?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

In a commutative ring $R$, when does the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le n$ imply $\prod_{1\le i\le n} r_i\mid r$ (when $r_i$ are fixed)?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

added 23 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

In a commutative ring $R$, when does the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies $\prod r_i\mid r$ (when $r_i$ are fixed)?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

In a commutative ring $R$, when the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies $\prod r_i\mid r$?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

In a commutative ring $R$, when does the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies $\prod r_i\mid r$ (when $r_i$ are fixed)?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?

Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

When an element of a ring that is divisible by a finite set of elements is necessarily divisible by their product?

In a commutative ring $R$, when the assumption $r_i\mid r$ for $1\le i\le r$ implies $\prod r_i\mid r$?

Does there exist any criterion for this implication that is related to regular sequences?