Timeline for Number of distinct entries in a rotation invariant cube
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2022 at 18:26 | vote | accept | Jacob Helwig | ||
| Dec 3, 2022 at 10:35 | history | edited | Maarten Havinga | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 43 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2022 at 10:12 | history | edited | Maarten Havinga | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 67 characters in body
|
| Dec 3, 2022 at 10:10 | comment | added | Maarten Havinga | You are right, I will edit my answer | |
| Dec 2, 2022 at 17:34 | comment | added | Jacob Helwig | I think that this is over-counted. In the $n=3$ case, the entries you identified do indeed produce a roto-invariant cube. When $n=4$, though, there are some issues. For example, the $(3,4,2)$ and $(4,3,2)$ entries are permitted to be distinct from one another because these indices are odd permutations with respect to the other. However, I believe that these entries should be the same for roto-invariance. See the example in my edit | |
| Dec 1, 2022 at 21:47 | vote | accept | Jacob Helwig | ||
| Dec 2, 2022 at 17:07 | |||||
| Dec 1, 2022 at 21:30 | vote | accept | Jacob Helwig | ||
| Dec 1, 2022 at 21:47 | |||||
| Dec 1, 2022 at 19:45 | history | answered | Maarten Havinga | CC BY-SA 4.0 |