Skip to main content
added 252 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

C. Palm's theory of spatial point processes relies heavily on measure theory in an abstract setting. A more gentle introduction is given in the lecture notes Conditioning in spatial point processes. Section 3, in particular, defines the Palm distribution on a finite set of points. This definition involves only elementary concepts.


I now notice that these lecture notes are the same source as mentioned in the OP (without a link, so I did not notice earlier). I do think this is the most accessible exposition of the Palm distribution, by considering the finite case first.

C. Palm's theory of spatial point processes relies heavily on measure theory in an abstract setting. A more gentle introduction is given in the lecture notes Conditioning in spatial point processes. Section 3, in particular, defines the Palm distribution on a finite set of points. This definition involves only elementary concepts.

C. Palm's theory of spatial point processes relies heavily on measure theory in an abstract setting. A more gentle introduction is given in the lecture notes Conditioning in spatial point processes. Section 3, in particular, defines the Palm distribution on a finite set of points. This definition involves only elementary concepts.


I now notice that these lecture notes are the same source as mentioned in the OP (without a link, so I did not notice earlier). I do think this is the most accessible exposition of the Palm distribution, by considering the finite case first.

Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.2k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

C. Palm's theory of spatial point processes relies heavily on measure theory in an abstract setting. A more gentle introduction is given in the lecture notes Conditioning in spatial point processes. Section 3, in particular, defines the Palm distribution on a finite set of points. This definition involves only elementary concepts.