Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 21, 2022 at 7:34 history bounty ended Dasherman
Nov 20, 2022 at 14:28 comment added Iosif Pinelis @Dasherman : Unfortunately, I don't know how to complete the proof of the $\psi$-irreducibility or to find a counterexample. I have posted a question about a special case of this at mathoverflow.net/questions/434854/… but have not received a valid answer yet. It appears that, if a counterexample exists, it should be rather exotic.
Nov 20, 2022 at 9:49 comment added Dasherman I see, thank you. So to summarize: you've shown that the product chain is aperiodic, but the proof for $\psi$-irreducibility isn't complete yet. Do you think the claim is true without additional conditions, or do you perhaps have (a path towards) a counterexample in mind?
Nov 18, 2022 at 4:26 comment added Iosif Pinelis @Dasherman : By Theorem 5.4.4 in the book, this answer does prove that the product chain is aperiodic -- because in that theorem one can use any $\nu_k$-small set $C\in\mathscr B^+(\mathcal X)$ with $\nu_k(C)>0$. As for the $\psi$-irreducibility, I have added an idea on how to extend its limited version to the complete one.
Nov 18, 2022 at 4:24 history edited Iosif Pinelis CC BY-SA 4.0
added 880 characters in body
Nov 18, 2022 at 0:56 comment added Dasherman Thanks for the detailed answer! Why is it sufficient to only consider rectangles of positive measure? It is not immediately clear to me why this is sufficient for irreducibility nor for aperiodicity. There may be sets of positive measure in the product space that don't contain any rectangles of positive measure.
Nov 17, 2022 at 23:16 history answered Iosif Pinelis CC BY-SA 4.0