Timeline for Is there an alternative to the arXiv for uploading mathematical papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19 at 18:17 | vote | accept | Favst | ||
| Nov 18, 2022 at 20:22 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | @Favst there are many examples of predatory publishers and predatory journals that waive fees on particular occasions. I find it quite odd that you (in the original post) were so relaxed about accusing moderators of a crucial service of harassment but feel the need to be so protective of the journal name. | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 17:15 | history | edited | Stefan Kohl♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Removed a paragraph, in response to a flag.
|
| Nov 18, 2022 at 12:33 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
as discussed in chat https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/10243/2022/11/18 - added the tag (online-resources)
|
|
| Nov 18, 2022 at 11:19 | comment | added | Favst | @DeaneYang In this case, the reason for posting a published paper on the arXiv is to incorporate the modifications that prove the conjectures and the OEIS to it where the conjectures have been sitting for a while. I might just wait until a journal publishes the second paper and link the OEIS to that instead. | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 11:17 | comment | added | Favst | @VladimirDotsenko it's not a prestigious journal by any means, but it's not a predatory journal. They do not ask for fees and I received meaningful feedback from a reviewer that had to be incorporated as a revision before acceptance. I would rather not turn this thread into being about supporting/demeaning a particular journal, so I'll avoid getting into details. | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 6:09 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
moved question to body
|
| Nov 18, 2022 at 3:54 | comment | added | Marco Ripà | I've just found this article which could be quite useful for knowing more about other common online resources for licence/code/DOI/etc., such as Zenodo, Dryad, GitHub, Figshare,... researchgate.net/publication/… | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 3:16 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Figshare is another venue you could try. | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 2:32 | answer | added | Marco Ripà | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 18, 2022 at 0:07 | comment | added | Deane Yang | @DenisT, good point. I forgot about the paywall. | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 22:12 | comment | added | Denis T | @DeaneYang Did you think of a possibility that some people actually write papers to be read, and not only "published" behind a paywall? | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 19:21 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Why is there a need to post the paper on arXiv, if it has already been published? | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:29 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | Also, may I ask where it was published? The general criterion of arXiv has always been "publishable in a non-predatory journal". | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:27 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | Perhaps you might find the answers here useful: mathoverflow.net/questions/357077/… | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:22 | comment | added | Favst | @RyanBudney The original paper has already been published. I have submitted the newer results (those that resolve the conjectures on the OEIS) to a different journal for refereeing. I had hoped to post the latter on the arXiv soon so that the OEIS has a link as a reference, but it looks like that is not an option at the moment. | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:16 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | There is of course an enormous number of mathematical journals you could submit to. Publishing in reputable journals is an excellent way to get posting privileges on the arXiv. If you don't like those options, you could post on a website of your own design, i.e. self-publish. | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:06 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViXra | |
| Nov 17, 2022 at 18:01 | history | asked | Favst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |