Timeline for Injectivity of the cohomology map induced by some projection map
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2022 at 2:07 | vote | accept | Ye Weicheng | ||
| Nov 15, 2022 at 12:29 | |||||
| Nov 14, 2022 at 23:55 | history | edited | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1954 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2022 at 23:41 | history | edited | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1954 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2022 at 23:12 | history | undeleted | Fernando Muro | ||
| Nov 14, 2022 at 23:12 | history | deleted | Fernando Muro | via Vote | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 21:43 | history | edited | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
More detail
|
| Nov 14, 2022 at 17:34 | history | edited | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2022 at 17:27 | history | undeleted | Fernando Muro | ||
| Nov 14, 2022 at 17:27 | history | edited | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 284 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2022 at 16:50 | history | deleted | Fernando Muro | via Vote | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 16:47 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Sorry, I mistook $\pi_2BG_c$ for $\pi_2G_c$. I'll try to get a counterexample instead. | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 16:42 | comment | added | Ye Weicheng | Thank you for your answer! I cannot assume that $G_c$ is simply connected though, hence $\pi_2BG_c$ is not necessarily trivial | |
| Nov 14, 2022 at 16:34 | history | answered | Fernando Muro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |