Timeline for Blowups of Cohen-Macaulay varieties
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 25, 2022 at 13:07 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed broken link to springerlink.com; replaced broken link to math.fsu.edu with WebArchive snapshot; added DOIs of works by Huckaba–Huneke and Vasconcelos; added full citations in tooltips
|
| Aug 25, 2022 at 12:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 25, 2022 at 13:07 | |||||
| Oct 25, 2010 at 15:22 | history | edited | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 24 characters in body
|
| Oct 25, 2010 at 14:11 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | Actually, another reason this is interesting, is that I've certainly had people tell me several times that normal blow-ups of varieties with rational singularities still have rational singularities. This seems to debunk that assertion. | |
| Oct 25, 2010 at 14:09 | vote | accept | Karl Schwede | ||
| Oct 24, 2010 at 20:12 | history | edited | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added references
|
| Oct 24, 2010 at 19:51 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | Long thanks, that's quite interesting. I've looked at Vasconcelos' book a long time ago. This example seems to show that there is no reasonable condition on $X$ which would imply blow-ups are Cohen-Macaulay. | |
| Oct 24, 2010 at 19:01 | history | answered | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |