Timeline for Math papers where the only issue is that someone else could've done it but didn't
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2022 at 3:12 | comment | added | Kimball | I would say it's more like that a paper passes 3 but not 4. Is it interesting shouldn't be asked on a yes/no scale, but it is of sufficient interest to merit publication in a general journal? Okay now how about a very top general journal? | |
| Nov 3, 2022 at 12:28 | comment | added | Hollis Williams | I think when I say ''Is it correct?'' I implicitly mean ''Does it look to be probably correct?'', but I chose more blunt phrasing to match the other criteria. | |
| Nov 3, 2022 at 11:57 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | I’d replace 1 with “is it plausible” and make 5 “is it correct.” It’s a lot of work to try to check a paper and it’s not worth doing if it’s not going to be accepted. Hence the rise of quick opinions as a first step. | |
| S Nov 2, 2022 at 11:09 | history | answered | Hollis Williams | CC BY-SA 4.0 | |
| S Nov 2, 2022 at 11:09 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Hollis Williams |