Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 2, 2022 at 15:33 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed typo
Nov 28, 2022 at 15:45 vote accept Matheus Andrade
Nov 28, 2022 at 11:56 answer added Robert Bryant timeline score: 4
Nov 27, 2022 at 21:41 comment added Robert Bryant OK. As I suspected, the three-dimensional examples easily generalize to all higher dimensions as a 3-parameter family of non-trivial gradient almost Ricci solitons with harmonic curvature. They are not completely explicit, though, because each equivalence class of solutions corresponds to an integral curve of a vector field in $\mathbb{R}^3$. That vector field depends on a parameter: the (constant) scalar curvature $S=n(n{-}1)c$ of the metric $g$. I don't know how to integrate the vector field in elementary terms, but in the case $c=0$ phase portrait methods give good qualitative information.
Nov 27, 2022 at 18:45 history edited Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0
added 185 characters in body
Nov 27, 2022 at 18:43 comment added Matheus Andrade @RobertBryant thanks a lot! However, I must apologize again for not having included the hypothesis of dimension $\geq 4$ in my original post when I mentioned "part of some work that I've been doing with some other people...". But I am indeed very interested in knowing the explicit example of this $3$-parameter family you mentioned, I would very much appreciate it if you shared it.
Nov 27, 2022 at 14:06 comment added Robert Bryant I thought a little bit about this and did a few caculations. In dimension 3, at least, it is not true that a gradient almost Ricci soliton with harmonic curvature is locally Einstein. There is a $3$-parameter family of mutually non-isometric, nontrivial examples $(g,f,\lambda)$ in dimension $3$ with the function $\lambda$ and the sectional curvatures not being constant. I haven't looked at higher dimensions, but I don't see why it would necessarily fail there.
Nov 2, 2022 at 16:42 history edited Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0
added 24 characters in body
Nov 2, 2022 at 16:41 comment added Matheus Andrade @RobertBryant sorry, I indeed forgot to add it as a hypothesis. I'll fix it, thanks for pointing it out.
Nov 2, 2022 at 14:33 comment added Robert Bryant I'm curious why you define the condition of 'harmonic curvature' in one sentence and then don't refer to again. Is this a stray sentence that should be deleted or did you intend to add this as a hypothesis somewhere and forgot?
Nov 2, 2022 at 0:06 history edited Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0
added 50 characters in body
Nov 2, 2022 at 0:04 answer added Jeffrey Case timeline score: 4
Nov 1, 2022 at 22:13 history edited Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0
added 35 characters in body
Nov 1, 2022 at 22:02 history edited Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Nov 1, 2022 at 21:55 history asked Matheus Andrade CC BY-SA 4.0