Timeline for Origin of $L$ in $L^1$ and $L^2$ norms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2022 at 4:42 | vote | accept | ACR | ||
| Oct 25, 2022 at 7:47 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | Note that what is here written $$\left[\frac{p}{L^{p-1}}\right]$$ should actually be $$\left[L^{\frac{p}{p-1}}\right]$$. | |
| Oct 24, 2022 at 19:00 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 24, 2022 at 18:51 | history | edited | ACR | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2022 at 18:28 | comment | added | Michael Greinecker | Riesz certainly talks a lot about Lebesgue and how Lebesgue made the analysis possible. It looks at least plausible that this is where the name comes from. | |
| Oct 24, 2022 at 17:21 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo fixed + question mark + minor Math Jaxing
|
| Oct 24, 2022 at 17:13 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo fixed + question mark
|
| Oct 24, 2022 at 17:06 | history | asked | ACR | CC BY-SA 4.0 |