Skip to main content

Timeline for Robin's inequality for odd numbers

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 16, 2022 at 23:51 comment added Asanovic Tomas I wonder tabout that condition that allows for p<n (or p<p' where p' is the largest prime in the canonical expression of n), if not for all collosally abundant number there exist p that doesn't divide n.
Oct 16, 2022 at 23:36 comment added Will Jagy @AsanovicTomas yes, sufficiently large $n.$ The overall pattern is that a counterexample to RH here must resemble a Colossally Abundant number; in particular have non-increasing exponents in the prime factorization, including no prime gaps. In brief, the product of primorials.
Oct 16, 2022 at 22:17 comment added Asanovic Tomas Thats interesting, That means for any p for n sufficiently large if p doesn't divide n, then n is under robins bound? For instance this recent article, theorem 3.2 would be your second claim. The rest of the claims I've never seen them. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022247X14007069
Oct 16, 2022 at 22:15 vote accept Asanovic Tomas
Oct 16, 2022 at 15:29 history edited Will Jagy CC BY-SA 4.0
added 676 characters in body
Oct 16, 2022 at 15:11 history answered Will Jagy CC BY-SA 4.0