Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$$PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(3, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question on $PGL(n)$: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL(2)$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL(2)$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism, so claim should follow from $PSL$ reflecting isomorphisms; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and have failed to reproduce them now. For $n \geq 3$ you can find exact proof in Hahn's paper referenced below, but dimension restriction is unavoidable if you follow his strategy.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question on $PGL(n)$: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL(2)$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL(2)$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism, so claim should follow from $PSL$ reflecting isomorphisms; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and have failed to reproduce them now. For $n \geq 3$ you can find exact proof in Hahn's paper referenced below, but dimension restriction is unavoidable if you follow his strategy.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(3, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question on $PGL(n)$: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL(2)$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL(2)$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism, so claim should follow from $PSL$ reflecting isomorphisms; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and have failed to reproduce them now. For $n \geq 3$ you can find exact proof in Hahn's paper referenced below, but dimension restriction is unavoidable if you follow his strategy.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

added 231 characters in body
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question on $PGL(n)$: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL$$PGL(2)$-s over infiniteinfinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL$$PSL(2)$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism;isomorphism, so claim should follow from $PSL$ reflecting isomorphisms; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and have failed to reproduce them now. For $n \geq 3$ you can find exact proof in Hahn's paper referenced below, but dimension restriction is unavoidable if you follow his strategy.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and failed to reproduce them now.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question on $PGL(n)$: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL(2)$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL(2)$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism, so claim should follow from $PSL$ reflecting isomorphisms; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and have failed to reproduce them now. For $n \geq 3$ you can find exact proof in Hahn's paper referenced below, but dimension restriction is unavoidable if you follow his strategy.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

expanded and fixed factual errors
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32

PSL remembers everything!

OWhat's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$.T (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. O'MearaJ. Math.Vol. 45 (5), A general1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism theory for linear groupsbetween $PGL$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL$-s, 1977and a posteriori isomorphism; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and failed to reproduce them now.

InSligtly more general case where D$D$ is merely a subring of division ring, you can recover both D and n from either PGL  (n, Dbut $n \geq 5$) or PSL(ncan be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, D1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) ifis covered in $n \geq 2$A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(Another way2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of saying the same is that nonabelian central simple algebras are uniquely determined by their abstract automorphismisomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.)

When D is just a subring in division ringAn outdated, situation becomes a bit trickier.but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

PSL remembers everything!

O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977.

In case where D is a division ring, you can recover both D and n from either PGL(n, D) or PSL(n, D) if $n \geq 2$. (Another way of saying the same is that nonabelian central simple algebras are uniquely determined by their abstract automorphism groups.)

When D is just a subring in division ring, situation becomes a bit trickier.

PSL remembers everything!

What's written above is true for all $n, n_1 \geq 2$ and all skew fields except two finite cases: $PSL(2, \Bbb F_7) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_2)$, $PSL(2, \Bbb F_4) \cong PSL(2, \Bbb F_5)$. (V. M. Petechuk, Isomorphisms between linear groups over division rings, Can. J. Math.Vol. 45 (5), 1993 pp. 997-1008). Case $n \geq 3$ is more or less folklore, with field case settled by Shreier-wan der Waerden, and skew field case by Dieudonne-Hua.

Addressing exact question: I remember convincing myself a few years ago that isomorphism between $PGL$-s over infinite skew fields should induce two-way inclusions between according $PSL$-s, and a posteriori isomorphism; unfortunately, I have forgot exact arguments and failed to reproduce them now.

Sligtly more general case where $D$ is merely a subring of division ring  (but $n \geq 5$) can be found in O.T. O'Meara, A general isomorphism theory for linear groups, 1977. Possibilities of producing Morita equivalences from abstract group isomorphisms (for $n \geq 3$) is covered in A. J. Hahn, Category equivalences and linear groups over rings. Journal of Algebra, 77(2), 505–543.

As far as I know, possibility of abstract isomorphism between different linear groups over non-isomorphic skew fields is still an open problem.

An outdated, but pretty comprehensive survey on related topics can be found here https://web.osu.cz/~Zusmanovich/links/files/weisfeiler/1981-commalg.pdf

added 39 characters in body
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32
Loading
added 174 characters in body
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32
Loading
Source Link
Denis T
  • 4.6k
  • 2
  • 21
  • 32
Loading