Timeline for Restriction to dense subset of functions whose graph is dense
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 at 17:01 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I modified the proof so that we show the set is dense instead of just non-empty.
|
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:35 | vote | accept | Nate River | ||
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:33 | vote | accept | Nate River | ||
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:34 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:33 | comment | added | Nate River | Oh, though I guess this construction can be adapted quite easily. | |
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:29 | comment | added | Nate River | Hm, this certainly shows the existence of a $C^k$ condensation limit, but where is it shown that its $\varepsilon$ close to an arbitrarily prescribed $C^k$ function? Where is $\varepsilon$ used in the proof? | |
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:19 | history | edited | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 324 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2022 at 16:02 | history | answered | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 4.0 |