Timeline for Are algebraic groups over algebraically closed fields Cohen–Macaulay?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 7, 2022 at 21:22 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
`\mathrm{Spec}` -> `\operatorname{Spec}`
|
Oct 7, 2022 at 15:29 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
Oct 7, 2022 at 13:30 | history | became hot network question | |||
Oct 7, 2022 at 11:52 | answer | added | Matthieu Romagny | timeline score: 10 | |
Oct 7, 2022 at 11:40 | answer | added | Jason Starr | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 7, 2022 at 11:27 | comment | added | Leo Alonso | @MatthieuRomagny Why don't you post your comment as an answer? | |
Oct 7, 2022 at 8:07 | comment | added | Wilberd van der Kallen | See also stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0BF6 | |
Oct 7, 2022 at 7:03 | comment | added | Matthieu Romagny | You're welcome. | |
Oct 7, 2022 at 6:14 | comment | added | Takagi Benseki | Thank you very much Matthieu Romagny ! | |
Oct 6, 2022 at 18:44 | comment | added | Matthieu Romagny | In arbitrary characteristic they are locally complete intersection, hence Cohen-Macaulay. This is in SGA3, Exposé VII$_B$, Cor. 5.5.1. | |
Oct 6, 2022 at 18:40 | comment | added | YCor | In char. 0 they're smooth (hence CM). | |
Oct 6, 2022 at 18:27 | history | asked | Takagi Benseki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |