Timeline for Topologies in the vicinity of Euclidean space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 2, 2022 at 9:32 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
Oct 2, 2022 at 9:21 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Oct 2, 2022 at 9:11 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
Oct 2, 2022 at 9:04 | history | edited | dennis |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 2, 2022 at 8:56 | comment | added | dennis | @ViditNanda Edited. | |
Oct 2, 2022 at 8:52 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
Oct 2, 2022 at 4:22 | comment | added | Wlod AA | @ViditNanda -- horrible :) ##### you have your way with words, nice! | |
Oct 1, 2022 at 21:43 | comment | added | Vidit Nanda | It is not true that $f^{-1}(0)$ is a smooth manifold unless $0$ is a regular value of $f$. Take any closed subset $C \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ and let $f:\mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ be the (smooth!) function sending $x$ to the squared Euclidean distance from $x$ to $C$. Then $C = f^{-1}(0)$ even though $C$ could be a horrible Cantor set. | |
Oct 1, 2022 at 20:55 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2022 at 20:50 | answer | added | Piotr Hajlasz | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 1, 2022 at 20:13 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2022 at 20:07 | history | edited | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
Oct 1, 2022 at 20:02 | history | asked | dennis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |