Timeline for Hilbert Modular Newforms
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 at 16:21 | comment | added | user1073 | Kevin - P.S. To make the Gothic letters I used the \mathfrak command (i.e. \mathfrak{N} ) | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 15:25 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=1073 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 15:24 | comment | added | user1073 | Kevin - Thank you so much for your thoughtful answer. You're right that we think about Hilbert modular forms very differently, but it's nice to know that the result I want to use is true, in as much generality as I suspected (so I don't have to restrict the primes dividing the level of my newforms). Now I just need to figure out the best way to cite MO responses. Oh, and finish proving a few things. There's still that as well... | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 15:23 | history | edited | Kevin Buzzard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
My God I had two $\pi$s! Why didn't someone tell me!
|
| Oct 22, 2010 at 15:15 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | Sorry Olivier :-) The first version was funnier, but I knew I was doing the wrong thing and couldn't think of the right one in time. When I knew what the right thing was it seemed ridiculous to leave in the kids to school comments. Anyone who really wants to see them can look at previous edits, of course. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 14:20 | comment | added | Olivier | I kind of miss the sense of urgency pervasive in the first form of the answer. All this "Will I make it? Will my children be on time for school?" feel was rather enjoyable. That said, the argument about the jumps of the conductor being equal only if $V$ has invariants is nice. | |
| Oct 22, 2010 at 10:00 | history | edited | Kevin Buzzard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
finished the proof!
|
| Oct 22, 2010 at 6:38 | history | answered | Kevin Buzzard | CC BY-SA 2.5 |