Timeline for Number of spanning trees: bounds from structural parameters
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 16, 2017 at 15:31 | answer | added | Peter Heinig | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:04 | history | edited | user3409 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 68 characters in body; edited title
|
Nov 14, 2010 at 0:40 | history | edited | user3409 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
title; improved formatting
|
Oct 24, 2010 at 16:22 | history | edited | Yaroslav Bulatov |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 24, 2010 at 13:10 | answer | added | user3409 | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 22, 2010 at 10:16 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Oct 22, 2010 at 1:39 | answer | added | Gerry Myerson | timeline score: 5 | |
Oct 22, 2010 at 1:28 | comment | added | Gwyn Whieldon | As a rough count, if you've got n vertices, you've got less than $n^{n-2}$ trees. :) | |
Oct 22, 2010 at 0:03 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | To expand on Lukasz' comment: the upper bound is infinity, and the lower bound is zero. If the number of vertices is $n$, the upper bound is whatever you get for the complete graph, the lower bound is still zero. Maybe a good question would be, if you fix $c$, $0\lt c\lt1/2$, and ask about graphs with $n$ vertices and roughly $cn^2$ edges, what upper and lower bounds do you get as functions of $c$ and $n$. But we shouldn't have to write your question for you. | |
Oct 21, 2010 at 18:32 | comment | added | Łukasz Grabowski | You should tell in what terms do you want to get the bounds. | |
Oct 21, 2010 at 18:01 | answer | added | ohai | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 21, 2010 at 17:57 | history | asked | user3409 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |