Skip to main content
edited to reflect current answer
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Does every composition series Splitting of a finite group $G$ (not a direct product of simple groups) contain a solvable subgroup?with no abelian subfactor in composition series

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite groupLet $G$, there is be a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroupwith no abelian subfactor in its composition series.

Question: Let Is $G$ be a finite group such thatobtained from simple groups by iterating semidirect products?

(Initially it was asked whether $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (orgroups, but chief series$A_5\wr A_5$ was mentioned as an immediate counterexample.) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

Does every composition series of a finite group $G$ (not a direct product of simple groups) contain a solvable subgroup?

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

Splitting of a finite group with no abelian subfactor in composition series

Let $G$ be a finite group with no abelian subfactor in its composition series.

Is $G$ obtained from simple groups by iterating semidirect products?

(Initially it was asked whether $G$ is a direct product of simple groups, but $A_5\wr A_5$ was mentioned as an immediate counterexample.)

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
User01
  • 217
  • 1
  • 5

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product etc.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product etc.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

added 37 characters in body
Source Link
User01
  • 217
  • 1
  • 5

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product etc.) of non-abelian abelian simple groupsgroup. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a direct product of non-abelian simple groups. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

I need help with the following:

In this paper by Michio Suzuki, it is proved that for any finite group $G$, there is a solvable subgroup $S$ in $G$ such that $G=\langle S,g^{-1}Sg \rangle$ for some $g \in G$. This theorem also implies that every finite group has a solvable subgroup.

Question: Let $G$ be a finite group such that $G$ is not a product (direct, semi direct, wreath product etc.) of non abelian simple group. Is it true that every composition series (or chief series) of $G$ must contain at least one solvable subgroup?

fixed English
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Loading
Source Link
User01
  • 217
  • 1
  • 5
Loading