Timeline for Weirdness in the sequence "the number of divisors for a weird number"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2022 at 13:37 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I'm guessing we're being misled by only looking at small numbers, which don't have many factors. If you go far enough, you may find something that overtakes $15$ (proper) divisors, and then something that overtakes that number, and so on, ad infinitum. | |
| Sep 9, 2022 at 1:17 | comment | added | Prester John | Thanks. That is a nice analysis. I had noticed the prefix going up (to 70, for example). | |
| Sep 9, 2022 at 0:53 | history | edited | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 289 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2022 at 0:45 | history | edited | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 93 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2022 at 0:36 | history | answered | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |