Timeline for A rational polytope that is not a 01-polytope?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2023 at 13:25 | vote | accept | M. Winter | ||
| Jan 17, 2023 at 13:26 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2022 at 22:55 | comment | added | Francisco Santos | Embedding in higher dimension does not give you additional 0/1 polytopes. If you have a $d$-polytope $P$ embedded in dimension $n$ for some $n>d$ there are always $n-d$ coordinates that you can forget, to obtain a projection of $P$ in $\mathbb R^d$ with the same combinatorial type. If $P$ was 0/1, the projection still is. | |
| Oct 12, 2022 at 22:06 | answer | added | Francisco Santos | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 8, 2022 at 18:24 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 8, 2022 at 15:13 | answer | added | M. Winter | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 8, 2022 at 13:04 | comment | added | Sam Hopkins | Doesn’t the number of combinatorial types of (say, simple) polytopes grow too fast for this (I mean, realizing every one as a 01-polytope) to be possible? EDIT: oh, I see, maybe this is what your comment about embedding in higher dimensions was meant to address. | |
| Sep 8, 2022 at 10:22 | history | asked | M. Winter | CC BY-SA 4.0 |