Timeline for Homological algebra for commutative monoids?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2021 at 5:23 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Jul 30, 2021 at 3:57 | answer | added | Emily | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 6, 2010 at 16:22 | answer | added | Reid Barton | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 12, 2009 at 1:38 | answer | added | aleph0 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 11:08 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Monoids have an identity by definition. Also, it's not immediately straighforward that we have a good notion of a kernel either without categorifying to some extent, as indicated in the answer. | |
| Dec 9, 2009 at 2:54 | answer | added | SixWingedSeraph | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 21:31 | comment | added | javier | Added the "f-1" tag since I believe this question and its answers are interesting for people working over the field with one element. | |
| Dec 8, 2009 at 21:29 | history | edited | javier |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 17, 2009 at 18:21 | answer | added | marc | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 17, 2009 at 8:52 | answer | added | Shizhuo Zhang | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 22, 2009 at 18:50 | vote | accept | Chris Schommer-Pries | ||
| Oct 21, 2009 at 22:37 | answer | added | Peter Arndt | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 21, 2009 at 1:02 | answer | added | Charles Rezk | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 20, 2009 at 19:44 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 16, 2009 at 15:31 | answer | added | thel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 20:37 | answer | added | Eric Wofsey | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 19:21 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 18:02 | answer | added | Mikael Vejdemo-Johansson | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 17:12 | history | edited | Kim Morrison |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 13, 2009 at 16:38 | comment | added | Chris Schommer-Pries | Of course I'd be happy if the "ext groups" weren't groups but monoids. | |
| Oct 13, 2009 at 16:23 | history | asked | Chris Schommer-Pries | CC BY-SA 2.5 |