Timeline for Reducing the number of terms in Waring-Goldbach problem by allowing exponents to vary
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2022 at 2:49 | comment | added | Will Jagy | faculty.math.illinois.edu/~ford/wwwpapers/trnsup1.pdf and faculty.math.illinois.edu/~ford/wwwpapers/trnsup2.pdf . | |
| Sep 4, 2022 at 21:02 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Actually, my goal is to get closer to (binary) Goldbach. | |
| Sep 4, 2022 at 20:24 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | No, not necessarily. | |
| Sep 4, 2022 at 20:15 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | You probably want to constrain the $k_i$ to avoid trivial reductions to known (albeit very nontrivial) results, for starters, any choice with $k_1=k_2=k_3=1$ follows from ternary Goldbach. | |
| Sep 4, 2022 at 19:59 | history | asked | Sylvain JULIEN | CC BY-SA 4.0 |