Skip to main content
added 73 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.8k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

There is no such counterexample. Indeed, by Theorem 1, any strong mixing sequence obeys the $0$-$1$ law. Also, any $k$-dependent$m$-dependent sequence is obviously strong mixing, for any naturalinteger $k$$m\ge0$, and hence must obey the $0$-$1$ law.

There is no such counterexample. Indeed, by Theorem 1, any strong mixing sequence obeys the $0$-$1$ law. Also, any $k$-dependent sequence is obviously strong mixing, for any natural $k$, and hence must obey the $0$-$1$ law.

There is no such counterexample. Indeed, by Theorem 1, any strong mixing sequence obeys the $0$-$1$ law. Also, any $m$-dependent sequence is obviously strong mixing, for any integer $m\ge0$, and hence must obey the $0$-$1$ law.

Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.8k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

There is no such counterexample. Indeed, by Theorem 1, any strong mixing sequence obeys the $0$-$1$ law. Also, any $k$-dependent sequence is obviously strong mixing, for any natural $k$, and hence must obey the $0$-$1$ law.