Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 22, 2010 at 11:39 comment added Graham Ah - apologies then. I didn't mean to ask about face-width, but rather, as you suggest, edge-width of the dual graph.
Oct 21, 2010 at 10:53 comment added Tony Huynh Face-width at least n is actually your third condition with 1 replaced by n. That is, every non-contractible curve in the surface intersects the graph at least n times. So, yes your graph has face-width 1. From this definition, we have that face-width $\leq$ edge-width because any short non-contractible curve in the graph yields a short non-contractible curve in the surface (just follow the edges in parallel). So, you might be asking about graphs of face-width at least $n$. Or, you might be asking about graphs with edge-width at least $n$, and whose duals have edge-width at least $n$.
Oct 21, 2010 at 1:54 comment added Graham Tony, thanks for the response. If I understand correctly, you are only using the fact that the face-width is at least n, and not the edge-width condition. ie, using the second of my original conditions and not the first. Why is this graph not a counterexample to your claim? Consider a graph with a single vertex, and 2n edges from this vertex to itself, n of which are horizontal loops on the torus, and the other n of which are vertical loops. This graph has face-width n, and only 2n edges. Am I misunderstanding the definition of face-width, and this graph actually has face-width 1?
Oct 20, 2010 at 16:40 history edited Tony Huynh CC BY-SA 2.5
added 22 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
Oct 20, 2010 at 16:29 history answered Tony Huynh CC BY-SA 2.5